Vision (Basel). 2026 Feb 14;10(1):12. doi: 10.3390/vision10010012. ABSTRACT Head-mounted ("virtual reality") perimeters (HMPs), based on standard consumer electronic hardware, are a cheaper alternative to standard automated perimetry. They have not been validated in patients wit…
Vision (Basel). 2026 Feb 14;10(1):12. doi: 10.3390/vision10010012.
ABSTRACT
Head-mounted ("virtual reality") perimeters (HMPs), based on standard consumer electronic hardware, are a cheaper alternative to standard automated perimetry. They have not been validated in patients with inherited retinal disease (IRDs), yet. We evaluated the Iowa-HMP in a first pilot study. It consists of a legacy smartphone, a headset, and freely available, open-source software. We used the 10-2 grid, the ZEST algorithm, and a background of 10 cd/m2 to measure central visual fields in one normal subject, and in patients with occult macular dystrophy (n = 2), Stargardt's disease (n = 3) and retinitis pigmentosa (n = 6). Results were compared with those from an Octopus 900 perimeter. The typical patterns of visual field loss were clearly discernible, but head-mounted perimeters generally have a limited dynamic range. Within the dynamic range of the Iowa-HMP (14 to 30 dB Octopus sensitivity), the Limits of Agreement (Bland-Altman) were ±7.5 dB. The Iowa-HMP had a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.67 for detecting locations with low perimetric sensitivity (<14 dB in the Octopus perimetry) with a diagnostic specificity of 0.95. Although the Iowa-HMP cannot be directly compared to standard perimetry in IRDs, open software greatly facilitates research in this area.
PMID:41718256 | PMC:PMC12921939 | DOI:10.3390/vision10010012